Hi All,
I redid a test of an initial import of the Xymon SVN repository
into Git:
https://github.com/xymon-monitoring/xymon-svn-mirror
The goal was a faithful copy, not a cleanup:
- full SVN history imported
- no commits rewritten or dropped
- no branches renamed
- no tags modified
Two helper scripts used for the migration (SVN mirroring and
SVN-to-Git conversion) are included in the repository for
transparency and reproducibility. A short document
(GIT-MIGRATION.md) explains the methodology and the current
status.
Current state:
- 4.x-master is still the default branch, matching the historical
SVN layout
- a main branch was added to document the migration and related
scripts; it will probably be removed later
- no decisions have been made yet (branch naming, cleanup, or
future governance)
I would really appreciate if experienced contributors could take a
look at this work, as I don’t feel qualified to fully assess it
myself.
Henrik, if you’re available to validate it, you’ve been invited to
the repository with full access, as have JC, TOM, and others.
Please let me know if access doesn’t work.
In particular:
- check the repository structure
- verify that the history, branches, and tags look correct
- confirm that the import is technically sound
- review the migration methodology and scripts (on the main
branch)
Once the migration is validated, we’ll need to decide:
- whether this repository (github.com/xymon-monitoring/) makes
sense to keep, or if someone has a better proposal
- if and how to deprecate the SVN repository
Any feedback is welcome.
Best regards,
Bruno
Hi Tom,
I did Invite you to xymon-monitoing repo!
BrunoLe 13.01.2026 à 16:01, Tom Schmidt via Xymon a écrit :
I have contributed to and used Xymon for decades since the Big Brother days. My team used it to monitor hundreds of systems at my former workplace. I have now been retired for 6 years and use Xymon at home to monitor my local network. I have been running the 4.4.0 alpha1 release on Rocky Linux 8 and 9 platforms and have submitted many patches for it. I have created several external monitors for my local home devices, such as ASUS routers, HP and Epson printers, SolarEdge inverter, and Foscam IP cameras.
I am willing to help in any way I can, but I have no experience running repositories. I do have a good background in C and Linux. I agree that it would be best if a single source for the repository would be best.
Tom Schmidt
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 7:36 AM Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Thanks Copilot.
Let's refrain from AI slop in this mailing list, please.
_______________________________________________On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 9:24 AM Bruno Manzoni via Xymon <xymon@xymon.com> wrote:
HI all_______________________________________________
Instruction / call for feedback
This summary was prepared from mailing list discussions and user input to give a clear overview of the current Xymon situation.
Feedback from users, maintainers, and operators is strongly requested to confirm this view and to indicate their willingness to help by briefly listing their relevant skills, availability, and areas of interest (e.g. maintenance, releases, packaging, testing, or specific technical domains).
Resume
- Xymon development is largely inactive upstream.
- Version 4.3 is the only production-ready release.
- Version 4.4 is unfinished and experimental.
- Most maintenance work is done downstream, causing duplicated effort.
Main problem
- There is no active upstream maintainer group and no modern collaboration workflow.
- This is the root cause of fragmented patches, stalled releases, and unfinished work (notably IPv6 in 4.4).
Minimal requirements / immediate next steps
- One public Git repository accepted as the upstream reference.
- One or two interim maintainers with merge and release responsibility.
- One maintained production branch: 4.3.
- A basic issue list to track bugs and patches.
- A first consolidated 4.3.x maintenance release.
Who can help
- Distribution maintainers (Debian, FreeBSD).
- The original author (Henrik) for CVS migration support.
- Production users for testing and validation.
- Community members willing to help maintain releases.
Bruno
Le 13.01.2026 à 10:13, Henrik Størner via Xymon a écrit :
Hi,
speaking for myself, I must admit that I haven't worked on Xymon for several years. Just lurking on the mailing list occasionally.
J.C.Cleaver was maintaining the 4.3.30 version and I was working on the 4.4 branch, but both efforts have stalled - mine certainly has.
A Git repo would undoubtedly make it easier for people to contribute than the current Sourceforge CVS repository, so if the is an interest in maintaining or even developing Xymon further, then that would be a very good first step.
About the state of the various branches, 4.3 is certainly the production version - this should be priority #1 when moving to Git. The 4.4 branch is - as Roland mentions - very unfinished and alpha-like. It was an attempt on my part to move all of the networking code into a library with support for both IPv4 and IPv6 - quite a bit of it was working, but it was not completed or even stress-tested. It is certainly not bug-free.
I cannot offer to restart Xymon development by myself, but I will be happy to assist anyone with getting the code moved from Sourceforge to a Git repo - if you need any special access to Sourceforge.
Regards,
Henrik
Roland Rosenfeld skrev den 13-01-2026 08:47:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2026, Mark Felder via Xymon wrote:
Is Henrik or JC Cleaver still working on Xymon? I am still the
maintainer of the packages on FreeBSD and have been crawling through
the mailing list archives, Debian packages, etc and have accumulated
a lot of patches that have never made it into a Xymon release. I'm
aware there's an Alpha of 4.4 with IPv6 support and a lot of changes
too, but it's very much unfinished last I saw (IPv6 for
client-server but Xymonnet not refactored to be able to execute IPv6
tests IIRC...)
Similar here, as one of the Debian maintainers of the package. We
maintain several patches for 4.3.30 in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xymon/-/tree/master/debian/patches and
even more for 4.4alpha1 in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xymon/-/tree/experimental/debian/patches
but the latter are not enough to use 4.4 in a production environment,
since there are still some open issues.
It would be great to have some shared GIT repo where all the patches
from different sources can be consolidated and where we can track open
issues, instead of doing duplicated work on different distributions...
I'd like to light the fire again. Xymon is something special and I
keep coming back to it. It's just the perfect amount of simplicity
and power to make monitoring things easy.
Same here. My employer uses this with over thousand hosts, several
custom addons (for server and client) and with devmon for SNMP
polling. And we didn't find a better alternative for our needs yet.
I'd be very happy to see activity in xymon development again.
Greetings
Roland
_______________________________________________
Xymon mailing list -- xymon@xymon.com
To unsubscribe send an email to xymon-leave@xymon.com
_______________________________________________ Xymon mailing list -- xymon@xymon.com To unsubscribe send an email to xymon-leave@xymon.com
Xymon mailing list -- xymon@xymon.com
To unsubscribe send an email to xymon-leave@xymon.com
Xymon mailing list -- xymon@xymon.com
To unsubscribe send an email to xymon-leave@xymon.com
_______________________________________________ Xymon mailing list -- xymon@xymon.com To unsubscribe send an email to xymon-leave@xymon.com
_______________________________________________ Xymon mailing list -- xymon@xymon.com To unsubscribe send an email to xymon-leave@xymon.com