Hi Henrik
I have been scouting around the perl/CGI scripts (or at least that, what I think they are) and I have seen where you set the disk graphs to a maximum 4 file systems per graph, splitting them over multiple graphs as reguired. (I think. What I know about perl & CGI is dangerous)
Is there a way you can implement that as a parameter for all custom graphs? I was thinking it might be good to add it as a parameter in the graph definition in hobbitgraph.cfg
Regards Vernon
NOTICE: This message and any attachments are confidential and may contain copyright material of Australian Finance Group Limited or a third party. It is intended solely for the purpose of the addressee and any other named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution, disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. The confidentiality attached to this message is not waived or lost by reason of the mistaken transmission or delivery to any unintended party. If you have received this message in error, please notify the author immediately or contact Australian Finance Group on +61 8 9420 7888.
sorry to make up this name "sublevel alerts", correct me if there is a better term you think.
What:
sublevel alerts: to be able to send out alerts to differrent owners of different monitored disk partitions or processes.
Why: We found it is needed to enable the owner of a process or disk partition as the main recepient of the alerts. This way we can hold owner responsible on using the disk partition wisely. currently BB can only send out alerts to both unixteam and oracleteam when disk or process threshold reached. (see example below).
Example:
[bbs ] tail bb-dftab.DIST
ANY PARTITIONS NOT EXPLICITLY LISTED HERE WILL
USE THE VALUES SET BY DFWARN & DFPANIC SET IN
bbdef.sh. DEFAULTS IN bbdef.sh ARE
WARNING AT 90% AND PANIC AT 95%
You can also use values > 100 to make it always green
/usr:92:98 : unixteam at test.com /home:88:93: engineergrp at test.com /db:100:101: oracleteam at test.com [ilad4001|bbs ] tail bb-proctab.DIST
If you put a process with no directives then it is
test condition is that at least 1 process must be running
It keeps backward compatibility
: sshd : localhost: sendmail;<=2 bbrun !xntpdd : httpd;>=16: unixteam at test.com localhost : :snmpd "sleep 30;<6": unixteam at test.com www.bobo.com : inetd : bbd: unixteam at test.com www: inetdd : bbdd: unixteam at test.com llocalhsot: lsntr:: oracleteam at test.com [|bbs ]
Question: Can hobbit consider to support this feature ? Is there work around you know for existing BB users ?
Thanks for your time
T.J. Yang
As far as I know, this is not possible within BB or Hobbit nor extension at deadcat (But I have not checked yet). I would be interested in this feature too!
Peter
2005/8/30, T.J. Yang <tj_yang at hotmail.com>:
What:
sublevel alerts: to be able to send out alerts to differrent owners of different monitored disk partitions or processes.
"fine grain alert" is a better term than "sublevel alert". I only see one followup. I am interested to see this feature to be done. I am not much a developer.so I can't help much coding wise.
Can anyone comment how diffcult is it to get this feature ?
Can this be done by external moudle approach ?
Right now, I don't have whole BB/Hobbit server architecture flowchart in my head so I am looking for comments that knows.
Thanks for your to comment
tj
From: "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang at hotmail.com> Reply-To: hobbit at hswn.dk To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: [hobbit] "sublevel alerts" feature request Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:58:52 -0500
sorry to make up this name "sublevel alerts", correct me if there is a better term you think.
What:
sublevel alerts: to be able to send out alerts to differrent owners of different monitored disk partitions or processes.
Why: We found it is needed to enable the owner of a process or disk partition as the main recepient of the alerts. This way we can hold owner responsible on using the disk partition wisely. currently BB can only send out alerts to both unixteam and oracleteam when disk or process threshold reached. (see example below).
Example:
[bbs ] tail bb-dftab.DIST
ANY PARTITIONS NOT EXPLICITLY LISTED HERE WILL
USE THE VALUES SET BY DFWARN & DFPANIC SET IN
bbdef.sh. DEFAULTS IN bbdef.sh ARE
WARNING AT 90% AND PANIC AT 95%
You can also use values > 100 to make it always green
/usr:92:98 : unixteam at test.com /home:88:93: engineergrp at test.com /db:100:101: oracleteam at test.com [ilad4001|bbs ] tail bb-proctab.DIST
If you put a process with no directives then it is
test condition is that at least 1 process must be running
It keeps backward compatibility
: sshd : localhost: sendmail;<=2 bbrun !xntpdd : httpd;>=16: unixteam at test.com localhost : :snmpd "sleep 30;<6": unixteam at test.com www.bobo.com : inetd : bbd: unixteam at test.com www: inetdd : bbdd: unixteam at test.com llocalhsot: lsntr:: oracleteam at test.com [|bbs ]
Question: Can hobbit consider to support this feature ? Is there work around you know for existing BB users ?
Thanks for your time
T.J. Yang
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
Execuse me for missing a few words in my previous email. I am sure you can put in the right words when you read through the sentences.
tj
From: "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang at hotmail.com> Reply-To: hobbit at hswn.dk To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: RE: [hobbit] "sublevel alerts" feature request Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:20:42 -0500
"fine grain alert" is a better term than "sublevel alert". I only see one followup. I am interested to see this feature to be done. I am not much a developer.so I can't help much coding wise.
Can anyone comment how diffcult is it to get this feature ?
Can this be done by external moudle approach ?
Right now, I don't have whole BB/Hobbit server architecture flowchart in my head so I am looking for comments that knows.
Thanks for your to comment
tj
From: "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang at hotmail.com> Reply-To: hobbit at hswn.dk To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: [hobbit] "sublevel alerts" feature request Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:58:52 -0500
sorry to make up this name "sublevel alerts", correct me if there is a better term you think.
What:
sublevel alerts: to be able to send out alerts to differrent owners of different monitored disk partitions or processes.
Why: We found it is needed to enable the owner of a process or disk partition as the main recepient of the alerts. This way we can hold owner responsible on using the disk partition wisely. currently BB can only send out alerts to both unixteam and oracleteam when disk or process threshold reached. (see example below).
Example:
[bbs ] tail bb-dftab.DIST
ANY PARTITIONS NOT EXPLICITLY LISTED HERE WILL
USE THE VALUES SET BY DFWARN & DFPANIC SET IN
bbdef.sh. DEFAULTS IN bbdef.sh ARE
WARNING AT 90% AND PANIC AT 95%
You can also use values > 100 to make it always green
/usr:92:98 : unixteam at test.com /home:88:93: engineergrp at test.com /db:100:101: oracleteam at test.com [ilad4001|bbs ] tail bb-proctab.DIST
If you put a process with no directives then it is
test condition is that at least 1 process must be running
It keeps backward compatibility
: sshd : localhost: sendmail;<=2 bbrun !xntpdd : httpd;>=16: unixteam at test.com localhost : :snmpd "sleep 30;<6": unixteam at test.com www.bobo.com : inetd : bbd: unixteam at test.com www: inetdd : bbdd: unixteam at test.com llocalhsot: lsntr:: oracleteam at test.com [|bbs ]
Question: Can hobbit consider to support this feature ? Is there work around you know for existing BB users ?
Thanks for your time
T.J. Yang
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
participants (3)
-
peter.welter＠gmail.com
-
tj_yang＠hotmail.com
-
v.everett＠afgonline.com.au