Does hobbit support ipv6 addressing?
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
On 9/5/07, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:38:26PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Does hobbit support ipv6 addressing?
No.
Any plan to support it in the future maybe? I personally have no care for ipv6 but some org w/in the company were querying about it
Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:51:33PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On 9/5/07, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:38:26PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Does hobbit support ipv6 addressing?
No.
Any plan to support it in the future maybe? I personally have no care for ipv6 but some org w/in the company were querying about it
Not really. It wouldn't be all that difficult to do - some minor changes to the networking code to make it use PF_INET6 sockets instead of PF_INET and the like - but nobody I know are using IPv6, so it hasn't really been necessary.
Henrik
On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 1:26 AM, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:51:33PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On 9/5/07, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:38:26PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Does hobbit support ipv6 addressing?
No.
Any plan to support it in the future maybe? I personally have no care for ipv6 but some org w/in the company were querying about it
Not really. It wouldn't be all that difficult to do - some minor changes to the networking code to make it use PF_INET6 sockets instead of PF_INET and the like - but nobody I know are using IPv6, so it hasn't really been necessary.
My company wants us to move to ipv6. there is no deadline yet, but sooner is better. Do you have any plan plan when to support ipv6 ?
Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Henrik is way too busy to answer. It's been months since we have seem him.
Not sure who else develops Xymon now, or if they can answer that question.
On 6/9/10, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 1:26 AM, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:51:33PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On 9/5/07, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:38:26PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Does hobbit support ipv6 addressing?
No.
Any plan to support it in the future maybe? I personally have no care for ipv6 but some org w/in the company were querying about it
Not really. It wouldn't be all that difficult to do - some minor changes to the networking code to make it use PF_INET6 sockets instead of PF_INET and the like - but nobody I know are using IPv6, so it hasn't really been necessary.
My company wants us to move to ipv6. there is no deadline yet, but sooner is better. Do you have any plan plan when to support ipv6 ?
Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 1:26 AM, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:51:33PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
On 9/5/07, Henrik Stoerner <henrik at hswn.dk> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:38:26PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Does hobbit support ipv6 addressing?
No.
Any plan to support it in the future maybe? I personally have no care for ipv6 but some org w/in the company were querying about it
Not really. It wouldn't be all that difficult to do - some minor changes to the networking code to make it use PF_INET6 sockets instead of PF_INET and the like - but nobody I know are using IPv6, so it hasn't really been necessary.
My company wants us to move to ipv6. there is no deadline yet, but sooner is better. Do you have any plan plan when to support ipv6 ?
I am looking at latest svn and it still shows PF_INET
root at hobbit { /usr/src/hobbitsvn }$ svn update At revision 6311. root at hobbit { /usr/src/hobbitsvn }$ cd 4.4.0/ root at hobbit { /usr/src/hobbitsvn/4.4.0 }$ grep PF_INET */* bbnet/contest.c: newtest->addr.sin_family = PF_INET; bbnet/contest.c: nextinqueue->fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); bbnet/contest.c: src.sin_family = PF_INET; hobbitd/hobbitd_channel.c: peer->peersocket = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); lib/sendmsg.c: sockfd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
participants (3)
-
henrik＠hswn.dk
-
josh＠imaginenetworksllc.com
-
vadud3＠gmail.com