Hi!
I'm currently going to setup some "cloud" infrastructure as a training platform to get a deeper insight into very recent developments, like nested virtualization, storage failover and a lot of IPv6.
Since my fellow hobbit did very well over the last couple of years, I'ld really like to stay with xymon.
My question targets the proposed IPv6 capabilities in the upcoming release. Is it worth to give a try to the code in trunk? Or is it too early for resiliant statements? Also, should I expect big configuration differences between 4.3.10 and the cutting edge?
Thanks for your suggestions!
Cheers,
- Stephan
On 19-12-2012 11:18, Stephan Seitz wrote:
My question targets the proposed IPv6 capabilities in the upcoming release. Is it worth to give a try to the code in trunk? Or is it too early for resiliant statements?
It's to run in a production setup, because the test analysis part of the network test tool is not yet in place. So you can run the network tests, but it won't generate any results yet (at least not for all of the test types).
Also, should I expect big configuration differences between 4.3.10 and the cutting edge?
There will be some, because network test definitions are moving from hosts.cfg over to analysis.cfg - I think. It hasn't been finalized yet, in part because the code isn't there.
Regards, Henrik
participants (3)
-
fclaire＠free.fr
-
henrik＠hswn.dk
-
s.seitz＠secretresearchfacility.com