Hi all,
can someone please tell me what is the correct syntax to get rid of the remote status displays? I was experimenting with several configs and now I have half a dozen of them on my display!
Thanks
Kevin
Note: The information contained in this email and in any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Sender accepts no liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted by this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and delete the email from your computer. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. Thank you. NOVA Information Systems, Inc.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:38:11PM -0500, Kevin.Hanrahan at novainfo.com wrote:
Hi all,
can someone please tell me what is the correct syntax to get rid of the remote status displays? I was experimenting with several configs and now I have half a dozen of them on my display!
If they are not updated, they should disappear automatically after 30 minutes.
You can force it to be dropped with ~/server/bin/bb "drop summary.COLUMN"
Henrik
Hello fellow hobbiters,
Currently I'm running Hobbit 4.0.2 on a Solaris 9 platform (Host X) and I'm also running BB (Host Y), using the BBRELAY-option (BBRELAY:X.domain.name).
On the Hobbit Host X, I've disabled bbnet to prevent to perform a double netwerk check (Both BB *and* Hobbit; too much); bbnet is blue dotted.
Then everything works seems to work fine, but... On host Y, there are 7 so called Remote Status Displays (RSD) and each time I refresh the browser, I see all 7 RSD. On Hobbit host X however, a refresh make some RSD disappear!? After waiting some time, and the normal refresh, the page is showing the normal stuff again, so finally it ressembles the BB display. But, it seems to me the RSD are not sticky.
Is there some explanation for this behaviour?
Thanks in advance,
Peter
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 05:09:17PM +0200, Gee Pee wrote:
Then everything works seems to work fine, but... On host Y, there are 7 so called Remote Status Displays (RSD) and each time I refresh the browser, I see all 7 RSD. On Hobbit host X however, a refresh make some RSD disappear!? After waiting some time, and the normal refresh, the page is showing the normal stuff again, so finally it ressembles the BB display. But, it seems to me the RSD are not sticky.
Is there some explanation for this behaviour?
RSD's are deleted automatically if they haven't been updated. A normal test would go purple, but RSD's are just silently dropped. They are also not saved across a restart of the Hobbit daemon, so if you do a restart then they'll disappear - until an update arrives and then they'll re-appear.
I've had a couple of reports that the HEARTBEAT setting in hobbitlaunch.cfg triggers too frequently, causing a restart of the Hobbit daemon - this will cause your RSD's to disappear. If that is the case, you should see messages in the /var/log/hobbit/hobbitlaunch.log file about this - could you check if there is any mention of "heartbeat lost" in that file ? You can try and just remove the "HEARTBEAT" line from hobbitlaunch.cfg (the heartbeat-thing is a kludge, really - it should not be needed).
Henrik
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:38:11PM, Kevin.Hanrahan at novainfo.com wrote:
Hi all,
can someone please tell me what is the correct syntax to get rid of the remote status displays? I was experimenting with several configs and now I have half a dozen of them on my display!
Thanks
Kevin
Kevin,
Do you really think anyone looks at your disclaimer?. You are just unnecessarily filling up the mailing list with 'garbage'. I would understand if it were an email to one/all of your employees. But outside that jurisdiction it is pretty much useless. I am sure lot of people here will agree with me. Please avoid using disclaimers in mailing list.
Avoid disclaimers: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
Note: The information contained in this email and in any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Sender accepts no liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted by this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and delete the email from your computer. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. Thank you. NOVA Information Systems, Inc.
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu "..there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit...try to be in the first group;...less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
Hello -
Do you really think anyone looks at your disclaimer?. You are just unnecessarily filling up the mailing list with 'garbage'. I would understand if it were an email to one/all of your employees. But outside that jurisdiction it is pretty much useless. I am sure lot of people here will agree with me. Please avoid using disclaimers in mailing list.
Avoid disclaimers: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
I am going to go a bit off topic here at the moment, but....
In many cases disclaimers - especially ones such as these - are added by companies email systems as the message is headed out the door. The person sending the message often is not given a choice if it is added or not. While I agree that many of the disclaimers that I have seen are less than perfect, if you don't like the disclaimers, don't look at them...
Any comments on this please send them directly to me.
-- --==[ Bob Gordon ]==--
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:39:57PM, Bob Gordon wrote:
Hello -
Do you really think anyone looks at your disclaimer?. You are just unnecessarily filling up the mailing list with 'garbage'. I would understand if it were an email to one/all of your employees. But outside that jurisdiction it is pretty much useless. I am sure lot of people here will agree with me. Please avoid using disclaimers in mailing list.
Avoid disclaimers: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
I am going to go a bit off topic here at the moment, but....
In many cases disclaimers - especially ones such as these - are added by companies email systems as the message is headed out the door. The
I can bet you that your company has policies regarding subscribing to mailing list and if you look your company has no jurisdiction on 'public' mailing list. Try using gmail/yahoo/msn if you have no control on your disclaimer
person sending the message often is not given a choice if it is added or not. While I agree that many of the disclaimers that I have seen are less than perfect, if you don't like the disclaimers, don't look at them...
Any comments on this please send them directly to me.
-- --==[ Bob Gordon ]==--
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu "..there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit...try to be in the first group;...less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
I know this is not my list, but if your going to complain about disclaimers then do it off list.
I'm sure everyone doesnt want to read all this dribble
----- Original Message ----- From: "Asif Iqbal" <iqbala-hobbit at qwestip.net> To: "Bob Gordon" <rgordonjr at gmail.com> Cc: <hobbit at hswn.dk> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:06 PM Subject: Re: [hobbit] Remote status display
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:39:57PM, Bob Gordon wrote:
Hello -
Do you really think anyone looks at your disclaimer?. You are just unnecessarily filling up the mailing list with 'garbage'. I would understand if it were an email to one/all of your employees. But outside that jurisdiction it is pretty much useless. I am sure lot of people here will agree with me. Please avoid using disclaimers in mailing list.
Avoid disclaimers: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
I am going to go a bit off topic here at the moment, but....
In many cases disclaimers - especially ones such as these - are added by companies email systems as the message is headed out the door. The
I can bet you that your company has policies regarding subscribing to mailing list and if you look your company has no jurisdiction on 'public' mailing list. Try using gmail/yahoo/msn if you have no control on your disclaimer
person sending the message often is not given a choice if it is added or not. While I agree that many of the disclaimers that I have seen are less than perfect, if you don't like the disclaimers, don't look at them...
Any comments on this please send them directly to me.
-- --==[ Bob Gordon ]==--
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu "..there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit...try to be in the first group;...less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
Please do not top-post.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:40:54PM, ZanDAhaR wrote:
I know this is not my list, but if your going to complain about disclaimers then do it off list.
This is a public mailing list and disclaimers are just abusing it. I shared my view with rest. This is not a complain
I'm sure everyone doesnt want to read all this dribble
Don't be so sure for everyone. My goal is to stop the abuse, not to dribble as you put it
----- Original Message ----- From: "Asif Iqbal" <iqbala-hobbit at qwestip.net> To: "Bob Gordon" <rgordonjr at gmail.com> Cc: <hobbit at hswn.dk> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:06 PM Subject: Re: [hobbit] Remote status display
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:39:57PM, Bob Gordon wrote:
Hello -
Do you really think anyone looks at your disclaimer?. You are just unnecessarily filling up the mailing list with 'garbage'. I would understand if it were an email to one/all of your employees. But outside that jurisdiction it is pretty much useless. I am sure lot of people here will agree with me. Please avoid using disclaimers in mailing list.
Avoid disclaimers: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
I am going to go a bit off topic here at the moment, but....
In many cases disclaimers - especially ones such as these - are added by companies email systems as the message is headed out the door. The
I can bet you that your company has policies regarding subscribing to mailing list and if you look your company has no jurisdiction on 'public' mailing list. Try using gmail/yahoo/msn if you have no control on your disclaimer
person sending the message often is not given a choice if it is added or not. While I agree that many of the disclaimers that I have seen are less than perfect, if you don't like the disclaimers, don't look at them...
Any comments on this please send them directly to me.
-- --==[ Bob Gordon ]==--
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu "..there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit...try to be in the first group;...less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:40:54 +1100, ZanDAhaR <allan at zandahar.net> wrote:
I know this is not my list, but if your going to complain about disclaimers then do it off list.
I'm sure everyone doesnt want to read all this dribble
Sounds like Asif is on a tear today. (yay, no top-post)
While I have no control over work's lame disclaimer, I'd rather the messages be in gmail for nice search/archiving. Although I can't say the disclaimers bother me much. At this point I'm used to ignoring them. (hipaa-insanity seemed to boost disclaimer usage)
Are there any official guidelines for this list or just the usual public-listserv-consensus? Other lists I'm on seem to be top-quote only. Bottom quoting will only confuse them..
-r
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:50:38PM, Robert Edeker wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:40:54 +1100, ZanDAhaR <allan at zandahar.net> wrote:
I know this is not my list, but if your going to complain about disclaimers then do it off list.
I'm sure everyone doesnt want to read all this dribble
Sounds like Asif is on a tear today. (yay, no top-post)
So much of communicating with adults.
While I have no control over work's lame disclaimer, I'd rather the
Sounds like you agree with me that disclaimers are 'garbage'
messages be in gmail for nice search/archiving. Although I can't say the disclaimers bother me much. At this point I'm used to ignoring them. (hipaa-insanity seemed to boost disclaimer usage)
Are there any official guidelines for this list or just the usual public-listserv-consensus? Other lists I'm on seem to be top-quote only. Bottom quoting will only confuse them..
Most of them doing it the right way and *not* top-posting. qmail/qmail-scanner/secureshell(openssh) are a few to mention
-r
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu "..there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit...try to be in the first group;...less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:11:16 -0500, Asif Iqbal <iqbala-hobbit at qwestip.net>
Sounds like Asif is on a tear today. (yay, no top-post)
So much of communicating with adults.
Like I said, a tear. Just my observation from the two threads.
While I have no control over work's lame disclaimer, I'd rather the
Sounds like you agree with me that disclaimers are 'garbage'
I agree and would disable the disclaimer at work if I had the opportunity. They're fairly useless and the sheer length of them can be excessive.
Most of them doing it the right way and *not* top-posting. qmail/qmail-scanner/secureshell(openssh) are a few to mention
I wouldn't doubt it. Perhaps Henrik can offer his 0.02c on the subject so we have an official policy for usage of his list.
(while I agree in concept, I don't have the time to really care enough to get agitated about it.)
-r
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:51:48 -0500, Robert Edeker <idxman01 at gmail.com>
I wouldn't doubt it. Perhaps Henrik can offer his 0.02c on the subject so we have an official policy for usage of his list.
oop :) Shame on me for not scanning my entire inbox for Henrik's message.
participants (7)
-
allan＠zandahar.net
-
henrik＠hswn.dk
-
idxman01＠gmail.com
-
iqbala-hobbit＠qwestip.net
-
Kevin.Hanrahan＠novainfo.com
-
peter.welter＠gmail.com
-
rgordonjr＠gmail.com