On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Galen Johnson <Galen.Johnson at sas.com> wrote:

http://xymonton.trantor.org/doku.php/reports

There is a report there.

from the example pdf samples it looks like, it gives you availability report of all services per host.

I am actually looking for aggregated availability per application (services in hobbit's term) all cross the hosts.

I will checkout the example that LMJ sent about using bbcombotest in this thread.

Thanks

=G=

-----Original Message----- From: Asif Iqbal [mailto:vadud3 at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:29 PM To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: [hobbit] aggregated availablity

Has anyone done any customization wtih bbgen or someother way to generate html and graph report of aggregated application availability?

So if I have host1,host2,host3 reporting availability of application app1 on their node I like a total availability of app1.

so host1 says app1 available 99% of time in last month. host2 reports 98% for same app1 and host3 reports 99%. I like to have a availability report of 98.67% for app1 .

I guess I could get the csv reports of bbgen for all hosts and then create a report of avg for the app1.

I rather not invent the procedure if something like that can be done by hobbit already

-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk

To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk

-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Buchan Milne <bgmilne at staff.telkomsa.net> wrote:

On Friday, 16 April 2010 15:41:24 Asif Iqbal wrote:

...

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Galen Johnson <Galen.Johnson at sas.com> wrote:

...

http://xymonton.trantor.org/doku.php/reports

There is a report there.

from the example pdf samples it looks like, it gives you availability report of all services per host.

I am actually looking for aggregated availability per application (services in hobbit's term) all cross the hosts.

I will checkout the example that LMJ sent about using bbcombotest in this thread.

But, bbcombotest would give you aggregate (which is what you asked for, but the example you gave was for average, which is a different thing, so I didn't suggest bbcombotest ...)

Thanks.

Any idea if the buttons (like green diamond or red blink) in service page of bbcombotest's can be clickable ? I like to be able to click those buttons to go the specific host.test service page from the combo report

So the service page for a combo test looks like this

mail.example.net.conn&&mail.example.net.pop3&&mail.example.net.smtp = 1&&1&&1 = 1 green mail.example.net.conn green mail.example.net.pop3 green mail.example.net.smtp

Would be nice if I could click on the green diamond button and that will take me to mail.example.net's conn service page, for example

Anyone expanded the bbcombotest report like that?

...

...

-----Original Message----- From: Asif Iqbal [mailto:vadud3 at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:29 PM To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: [hobbit] aggregated availablity

Has anyone done any customization wtih bbgen or someother way to generate html and graph report of aggregated application availability?

So if I have host1,host2,host3 reporting availability of application app1 on their node I like a total availability of app1.

so host1 says app1 available 99% of time in last month. host2 reports 98% for same app1 and host3 reports 99%. I like to have a availability report of 98.67% for app1 .

Regards, Buchan

-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:29 PM, L.M.J <linuxmasterjedi at free.fr> wrote:

Le Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:28:51 -0400, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> a écrit :

...

so host1 says app1 available 99% of time in last month. host2 reports 98% for same app1 and host3 reports 99%. I like to have a availability report of 98.67% for app1 .

I would try "bbcombotest". Create an entry like this en bbcombotest.cfg app1.conn = host1.conn || host2.conn || host3.conn (.conn or whatever)

That is exactly what I was looking for.

then, an entry in bb-host : 0.0.0.0              app1         # noconn NAME:"My Application 01"

How do I make sure no other service except the radius (for example) column shows up for all the hosts in this include page ?

I see NOCOLUMNS:column[,column] for each of those host entries as one option.

I sure don't want `notest' (like noconn) for each test unless I can have a .default. entry just for that include page. Can that be done? I guess I could test it out myself as well.

Thanks

and after a will, I will try to generate a report and watch the "My Application 01" availability. What do you think about that ?

-- LMJ "May the source be with you my young padawan" http://sites.google.com/site/imatruelinuxmasterjedi/

-- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Le Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:14:53 -0400, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> a écrit :

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:29 PM, L.M.J <linuxmasterjedi at free.fr> wrote:

...

Le Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:28:51 -0400, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> a écrit :

...

so host1 says app1 available 99% of time in last month. host2 reports 98% for same app1 and host3 reports 99%. I like to have a availability report of 98.67% for app1 .

I would try "bbcombotest". Create an entry like this en bbcombotest.cfg app1.conn = host1.conn || host2.conn || host3.conn (.conn or whatever)

That is exactly what I was looking for.

...

then, an entry in bb-host : 0.0.0.0              app1         # noconn NAME:"My Application 01"

How do I make sure no other service except the radius (for example) column shows up for all the hosts in this include page ?

I see NOCOLUMNS:column[,column] for each of those host entries as one option.

I sure don't want `notest' (like noconn) for each test unless I can have a .default. entry just for that include page. Can that be done? I guess I could test it out myself as well.

Thanks

I've create a group to make the app1 alone : group App1 Status 0.0.0.0              app1         # noconn NAME:"My Application 01"

or check out group-only COLUMN1|COLUMN2|COLUMN3 App1 Status 0.0.0.0              app1         # noconn NAME:"My Application 01"

-- LMJ "May the source be with you my young padawan" http://sites.google.com/site/imatruelinuxmasterjedi/