On Friday 22 August 2008 20:36:14 Jon Dustin wrote:

...

...

...

On 8/22/2008 at 10:01 AM, "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang at hotmail.com> wrote:

If given voting right, I would vote for using trac to coordinate the hobbit community. sourcefoge looks like has a bigger supersets of features than trac. I like the Statistics (R1) especially. Too bad we (hobbit community) is not totally embraceing sourceforge.

???

I don't see any point of doing any development without a development mailing list so that there can be common direction in development.

However, if there isn't going to be a development mailing list, you could add buchanmilne as a developer on the project ...

...

Ex, we still have our own mailling list while sourceforge provide this feature.

I can work with either sourceforge or trac solutions, but please lets utilize a solution's features as much as possible.

Until we are using all the features on sourceforge, there's pretty much no reason to discuss features in other tools we wouldn't use.

Henrik has already spoken about Sourceforge mailing list, and has expressed they are quite unreliable.

s/are/have been in the past/g

We haven't seen any problems on the devmon lists (but, granted, they don't have as much traffic).

The existing mailing list works quite well for us now, why not keep it as is?

I don't think there's any point in migrating the "users" mailing list, but there are some advantages to having a devel list on sourceforge.

Regards, Buchan