What if you were to use ssh and xargs to collect the same client information and then just send that message straight into the hobbit listener? Would that work?
Adam
-----Original Message----- From: Henrik Stoerner [mailto:henrik at hswn.dk] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 1:00 PM To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: Re: [hobbit] Agentless clients
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:46:36PM -0500, Scott Walters wrote:
I agree that having similar functionality to bb-fetch could be
useful
for a *few* remote/DMZ hosts, but it certainly doesn't scale well.
True, and I am not sold on the agentless clients idea either, but we've got such a great framework to try it on.
The first design decision in my mind would be if in agentless we mean
install/run/uninstall the hobbit client every 5m, i know this sounds horribly inefficient but I am attracted to the simplicity of agent and agentless machines being the 'same'. or just automagically install the client if the trust exists . . . . .
only running the exact OS commands necessary and capturing the output. This would require some new code on the server. But if done right, it could perhaps replace existing clients.
abstract the collection from the delivery . . . .
You can easily combine 1) and 2). Running something like this on the client-polling server would do it:
CLIENT="www.foo.com" CLIENTOS="linux" echo "client $CLIENT.$CLIENTOS" >/tmp/msg-$CLIENT.txt ssh $CLIENT < ~$BBHOME/bin/hobbitclient-$CLIENTOS.sh
/tmp/msg-$CLIENT.txt $BB $BBDISP "@" </tmp/msg-$CLIENT.txt
would run the normal client-side scripts without having them installed on each client box, and send the output to the Hobbit server in a normal "client" message. There is an issue with the OS'es that need special tools installed (usually to collect the memory statistics), but that can be worked around.
Regards, Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
participants (1)
-
adam.schebleinï¼ marquette.edu