Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 17:27 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 15:42:08 McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 15:05 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2008 15:26:55 Shawn Heisey wrote:
Geoff Steer wrote:
Every time I have to add a new monitor or get asked to graph something, I keep thinking 'This would be so much easier with hobbit!'
At my job, we're using two primary tools for network monitoring - Hobbit and OpenNMS. Hobbit is primarily for system monitoring, and OpenNMS for network monitoring.
You mean for SNMP polling?
<plug>Have you tried devmon</plug>
I would, if it supported snmp V3...
It's on the to-do list. If you can test,
Certainly. I have many hundreds of snmp v3 enabled hosts.
I will try and implement soon. AFAIK, SNMP_Session supports snmpv3, so it should mostly be a configuration issue.
No, I had to re-write mrtg to support Net_SNMP_Session, which has mostly the same API as SNMP_Session, with just a few tweaks. Net_SNMP_Session calls Net::SNMP, which has binaries from the NetSNMP project, so it's not as portable.
(You could also file a bug on the sourceforge tracker, so I don't forget).
ok
(First 2 weeks are looking most promising for some real devmon development).
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
One more item I would like to add to the list of differences between Hobbit and Nagios, which is somewhat critical at one of my sites, is proxy options - Nagios has nrpe and/or nsca. Something along the lines of having choices of different (push/pull) type proxy setups would be a big benefit for Hobbit, at least from my perspective.
-- --Moby
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin