On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:58 +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:41 +0200, Henrik Stoerner wrote:
Personally, I'd most like to see a 'free' client (ie, GPL, without the BB license issue),
Ditto, but I'd really like the bb-central approach. Most of the status information can be grabbed from non-privileged accounts on all unix-like platforms. I concede that a client is necessary in the windows world.
and I'd also like to see *much* better SNMP support. ie, point it at a router, and it will automatically (or some tool) setup the various values to monitor (interfaces, byte counter thresholds, cpu, temperature, etc) or a switch, or firewall, or UPS, or whatever thingamabob you have lying around.
Although I'd love to see a "better mrtg", I'd hate to re-invent the wheel on that one. It would be nice if the mrtg folks would add snmp-v3, but that's not in the offing today.
But I have a set of cfgmaker templates that I use to do pretty much what you are asking. It's got a few complex scripts wrapped around it. By policy every device has a unique snmp string, so I have a huge database with hostnames, community strings, and device-types that allows me to generate my mrtg and hobbit configurations on the fly.
Finally, what about some sort of compression/encryption protocol,
If we are building an extended protocol, we should support authentication as well. That's been a serious hole in bb for a long time - any hacker who sees that you are trusting bb for monitoring can simply send spoofed status messages to either distract you from the real mischief or hide it from obvious view.
-- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CNX Austin Energy
dan.mcdonald at austinenergy.com