From: henrik at hswn.dk (Henrik Stoerner) Reply-To: hobbit at hswn.dk To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: Re: [hobbit] Requesting a common encrypted port number for hobbit client/server Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:47:57 +0200
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 08:40:38AM -0500, T.J. Yang wrote:
Just and idea, port 1984 over the years got recognized by some kind of Internet organization as default port for bb client/server communication port.
Should we (hobbit community) pursue a common port number for hobbit client/server encrypted communication ?
I don't think this is necessary, and I'm not even sure such an application will be accepted.
The current trend for protocols that operate with both plain-text and encrypted traffic is to start with an un-encrypted connection, and then use a "STARTTLS" command to turn on encryption. The two sides can then negotiate if they can/will communicate.
Since this appears to be the method preferred by the Internet authorities, that's the one I've though about implementing. That shouldn't stop you from using stunnel, though.
If hb encryption via stunnel is implemented then a port for plaintext redirection is needed. thus the idea of requesting non-taken port( from iana) for hobbit encrypted message.
For my understanding, BB Pro can do message encryption already and looks like they are using port 1984 also.
What is the impact of mixing bb encrypted message and hb encrypted message protocols on same port number ? and I don't believe Quest publish the bb message encryption protocol.
I think getting a port for hobbit itself is still good in the long run.
I see the need but don't how to get this done. which port number to use ? who(which entity) to ask ?
It's handled by IANA, You request it through http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl
Regards, Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place! http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us