In <12C0877BF55C7748BDDB82BDBD3E66F1378A5D at franklin.corp.shutterfly.com> "Bruce Lysik" <blysik at shutterfly.com> writes:
Why use 'make setup'? The make file basically suggests 'make install' for existing installations:
Build complete. To setup a new Hobbit server from scratch, now run 'make setup' as root To upgrade an existing Hobbit/BB server, now run 'make install' as root
Hey, you're asking me to be logical - that's unfair! :-))
What's the difference? I used 'make install' and added HEARTBEAT.
The main difference is that "make setup" also installs the files in ~/server/www/ and ~/server/web/, and adds any missing files to ~/server/etc .
Normally when upgrading, you probably shouldn't install these, since it is quite likely that you have modified them to setup a custom look'n'feel for your Hobbit installation. But during the beta test, I've had to modify these files a few times - fixing documentation bugs, adding new files - and therefore I've asked you to run "make setup".
Either one should work fine for upgrading from beta-5 to beta-6.
Henrik