Last I checked, the depends wasn't working properly and I haven't seen a release.
--Patrick
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Taylor Lewick <tlewick at tradebotsystems.com>wrote:
OK, thanks, any opinions on whether it is better to use route, or depends?
-----Original Message----- From: Johan Sjöberg [mailto:johan.sjoberg at deltamanagement.se] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:34 PM To: xymon at xymon.com Subject: [xymon] RE: xymon test dependencies
Hi.
Use the "route" setting. For each connected device, add "route: switch.company.com". That way, if the conn test of the switch fails, any conn test for the connected devices will go yellow instead of red.
/Johan
-----Original Message----- From: Taylor Lewick [mailto:tlewick at tradebotsystems.com] Sent: den 13 oktober 2010 18:01 To: xymon at xymon.com Subject: [xymon] xymon test dependencies
From the xymon.com webpage is this snippit...
Combined super-tests and test interdependencies ... Tests can also be configured to depend on each other, so that when a critical router goes down you will get alerts only for the router - and not from the 200 hosts behind the router.
I'm not seeing how to set this type of testing up, basically event correlation, so that if a switch goes down, hobbit knows not to send alerts for each connected host.
Can some point me in the right direction, i.e. specific man-page, or just show me an example of how to configure this?
Thanks, Taylor
To unsubscribe from the xymon list, send an e-mail to xymon-unsubscribe at xymon.com
To unsubscribe from the xymon list, send an e-mail to xymon-unsubscribe at xymon.com
To unsubscribe from the xymon list, send an e-mail to xymon-unsubscribe at xymon.com