mailinglists at websitemanagers.com.au 04/21/05 8:22 AM >>> Well, I don't see any problem with this, but I would like to see bbclient compatibility remain. I don't think hobbit yet has the right amount of client tests to be able to ignore what BB has. ie, even just the standard BB client works better than the current hobbit version (not that I've tried it, since you keep telling us it doesn't work)... but add to that all the stuff on www.deadcat.net, and, well... you know, thats a lot to try and replicate...
Losing deadcat stuff would be a bad thing. I guess that's part of breaking away. Hobbit will just need to spring something up like deadbunny or some other typical pet for a Hobbit.
To be honest, I wonder if the quest version of BB is actually selling/successful... ie, are there still loads of new BB users sprouting up, or is it just old BTF license users who are using/maintaining old BB installations.... We haven't seen any BTF releases, and I've not seen anything anywhere to indicate that there have been any commercial updates/changes either.
There haven't been many commercial updates, and it looks like Quest is starting to move away from giving the source out. I got an e-mail a couple of weeks ago, inviting me to try the new BBPe 3.1. Interestingly enough, there is a pdf on their site that goes through the differences between the Pe and BTF versions, and there's really only one - integration with SpotLight and FogLight.
Apparently the QA cycle for the new features is much longer than when it used to be purely BTF.
Paul