I second Tom's statement here.
We may have to maintain separate clients, but I would think the majority of supported systems represented here are headless or have no GUI.
Sent from my iPhone Please ignore spelling/grammar.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Tom Georgoulias <tomg at mcclatchyinteractive.com> wrote:
On 07/02/2010 05:47 AM, Neil Franken wrote:
Xymon is just one part of the equation for me. I see a lot of potential for Xymon in the Windows world but the BBWin client is well a very quiet project as well. I am not sure yet if we would maybe fork the code or create a new client. At this point I would suggest that maybe we look at a Java based client for xymon so we can run on a huge variety of platforms with one client. Anyway the whole client is a whole different ball game.
I would not be in favor of a java based client, the current design is much better on unix systems. It's one of the reasons xymon works well.
Tom
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk