On 19 September 2013 17:38, Rolf Schrittenlocher < schritte at ub.uni-frankfurt.de> wrote:
My idea is that values larger than 10 Gb are calculated the wrong way (because all zones using total memory less than 10 Gb are presented correctly). But I cannot find the place to fix this. Any ideas or hints?
Perhaps it's not a special case for >10G, but perhaps it's an overflow at 8G, so that anything larger than that goes negative. I'm guessing 8G (rather than 10G) would be the threshold, as it's a power of two. Are you able to reduce the zone's RAM allocation to a little greater, and then a little less than 8G to see if this is the case? Or do you have examples of correctly displayed values greater than 8G and less that 10G? By 8G, I mean exactly 2^33=8589934592 (or perhaps one less).
J