I switched from using BB to Hobbit.
The functionality of the 2 "look" the same but that is where it ends. Search for and old post that Henrik put out as to how Hobbit actually works. Basically Hobbit is mostly all done server(hobbit) side and is mostly all compiled code( runs fast) and BB in mostly client based where most of the test run as scripts on the clients.
Trent
Trent Melcher Unix/Linux Systems Administrator Securities America Financial Corporation (402) 399-9111 x2774 tmelcher at saionline.com
Securities America, Inc., a Registered Broker/Dealer, Member NASD/SIPC. Advisory services offered through Securities America Advisors, Inc., an SEC Registered Investment Advisory
The text of this communication is confidential, and use by any person who is not the intended recipient is prohibited. Any person who receives this communication in error is requested to immediately destroy the text of this communication without copying or further dissemination. Your cooperation is appreciated.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael A. Price [mailto:mprice at hst.nasa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 3:53 PM To: hobbit at hswn.dk Subject: [hobbit] Hobbit -vs- BB4
I currently use hobbit and devmon and love them both...
But the management I work for doesnt like the idea of opensource monitoring everything, they dont understand. So they are pushing me towards BB4 instead... I have never used BB4 and dont want to...
I heard they are both the same...
So I figured I would ask my fellow users, why is hobbit better??? I need to make a god argument for this...
thanks, michael
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk